Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:12

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
If you could instantly cancel one social norm, what would it be?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Mapping XRP’s road to $2.35 – Bulls, watch THESE levels next - AMBCrypto
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Samsung’s entry-level Galaxy Watch 7 has returned to its best price to date - The Verge
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Aut ut accusantium quos sint ad aperiam.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Six killed by Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid site, Hamas officials say - BBC
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What ESPN’s Football Power Index is projecting for Big 12 rivals BYU and Utah in 2025 - Deseret News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the best interracial stories that you hear or know and want to share?